How Do Conventional Application Package And ERP Differ? How To Ensure That The ERP Implementation Should Not Fail?

Question

How Do Conventional Application Package And ERP Differ? How To Ensure That The ERP Implementation Should Not Fail?

2 Answers

Answer Question

Answer 1

This, to me, appears to be two questions in one. In response to your first question, Conventional Application Package and ERP differ in a number of ways. An ERP (which stands for Enterprise Resource Planning) program allows a business owner or manager to focus upon, make attainable, and achieve business objectives. An ERP system is used throughout the entire company to ensure that resources and information are equally distributed throughout the company in order to allow each member of the company to achieve the goals they have been set. Although ERP programs were constructed for use in the largest companies, today they are used in companies and businesses of all sizes. ERP programs allow users to monitor and complete a number of broad ranging tasks. On the other hand, a conventional application package is used in order to allow the users within the company to complete a single task, or multiple tasks which are somehow related to one another, therefore a conventional application package appears to be less versatile and flexible than an ERP program to fulfill the needs of a company and those within it.

In response to the second part of your question, to ensure the success of the implementation of an ERP program, most companies who offer ERP software also offer a lot of support, in the form of consultation and customization. This means that you will be able to consult with the provider of your ERP program in order to get their advice about implementing your ERP software, and they will usually help you in many stages of the implementation. This also means that, to an extent, your ERP software may be customized in order to suit the needs of its users and your company as a whole. The process of customizing your new ERP software may also be referred to as configuration.

Answer 2

There are several conventional structured development approaches. The major ones are the ISDLC model, the prototyping approach and the software package lifecycle model. The implementation of an ERP system requires a new methodology that combines components from each of the above example.
In regard to the application packages, many products have been developed thus far and are selling well. So how do conventional application packages and ERP packages differ?
The first answer to this question is that ERP packages have as functions not only individual businesses such as accounts and inventory, but also the total range of main business necessary for company operation.
The second difference is that ERP packages are targeted at everything from small businesses to the largest organisations, and that it can be composed of a highly flexible decentralization database and an information system cluster linked by a network.
Third difference is global adaptation, represented by ERP packages’ multi-lingual and multi-currency capacity. In the present day, when companies irrespective of their size and market share are manufacturing and selling in various areas of the world, the globalization of management platforms is being hastened, along with the global adaptation of EIS.
Lastly the conventional application packages often fit a firm’s business processes only partially and the firms lack long-term control of the package’s direction like they reduce delays and help firm focus its resource on product s or services it creates. Whereas ERP gives a better Business Integration, Flexibility, Better analysis and planning capabilities, usage of latest technology etc.